Thursday 22 August 2013

Canadian company against Colombia and Venezuela


PACIFIC RUBIALES AND VENEZUELA
Talk given at the “Report Back from the People’s Tribunal in Colombia”
Organized by: CASA
August 20, 2013, OISE, Toronto

Maria Páez Victor

In the name of the Louis Riel Bolivarian Circle, and in my own, I want to thank the organizers of this event for giving us , and myself, the chance to express publicly our solidarity, indeed our love, for the Colombian people, who are our own people of Our America, and to accompany them, even if only in this miniscule way, in their struggles for social justice and peace.
We are living at a crossroads of history, a very unsettled and dangerous time.  We are witnessing the destruction of the international order, that is, of the international laws that up to now, uphold the sovereignty of nations, that set out limits to war, namely the Geneva Convention, and the laws that uphold Human Rights and democracy itself.
Today we are talking of the corporation Pacific Rubiales, but this issue, which is a matter of life and death for the populations, as well as of the ecosystems, as we have heard here today; but is much greater and much more sinister that that which involves Colombia or Venezuela. And, there is a special cautionary tale for us here in Canada too, the mining capital of the world.
We see how a powerful corporation is capable of wielding state power to oppress citizens in one country and of threatening the legitimate state of another nation. We are looking at the sheer power of an amoral corporation bent on usurping not just natural resources, but the powers that belong only to the people and the governments they legitimately elect.
Almost 400 years ago, in 1648,  the Treaty of Westphalia, ended a bloody 30 Years War in Europe. It was a muddled conflict between many states (Spain, France, Holland, Sweden, several German Princes, Switzerland), with two supra-national entities intervening, the Holy Roman Empire and the Vatican. This Treaty brought about the basis of our modern international laws as it recognized the concept of the Nation-state and its Sovereignty, by which was meant:
·    territorial integrity
·     non-intervention by other states, and
·     political determination that included the right of nations to determine their own official religion and governance, and as well recognized the freedom of religion of dissenters.
After the Second World War, even when the United Nations was created as a supra-national assembly whereby nations would discuss their conflicts in order to avoid war, it was still based on the concept of the sovereignty of the nation state. These laws have not always been kept, as we all know very well, but at least they were there as a compass and as a light.
The advent of the extreme right-wing agenda based on free market ideas of Milton Freidman, executed by powerful politicians such as Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, brought about the age of Corporate Capitalism, or as President Chávez called it, savage capitalism.  Today, of the world’s 100 largest economies, 51 are corporations and only 49 are countries.
We are witnessing an assault on the very idea of the nation state, and of democracy, and the enemy is the corporation and its instruments include international trade deals and arbitration tribunals, and the idea always floating about, of a supposed need for a “world government”, which we all know that means the government of the powerful.  For example, the World Trade Organization gives corporations veto power over states’ environmental and labour laws.
Corporations are global, they respect no boundaries or  democracy.  Ironically they have managed to obtain rights pertaining to human beings as they have been declared “persons” but once people enter a corporation, they cease to have those basic rights.
It was Ronald Reagan who maligned the nation state by saying: “The government is the problem not the solution” and Margaret Thatcher who, trashing all of social science, said: ”There is no such thing as society.” They ushered in the age of selfish individualism that denies the common interest, and opened the door to the deification of private enterprise embodied in the corporation, and the denial of the “common interest”. It is truly Hobbes’ infernal vision of a world of man against man.[i]
The people become oppressed by governments that do not represent their interest, let alone their best interest. Corporations can unduly influence states, and especially those in developing countries, under the guise of “helping their development”, of “bringing prosperity”, of “promoting economic growth”. Every time pubic social services are cut or privatized,  is a weakening of the legitimate role of government.
Corporations working in developing countries  target the workers’ unions, indigenous and rural communities, environmental and human rights ,NGOs,  as all these are seen  as an obstacles to its profit making. All in the name of “progress” , “development” and “economic growth”.
So a corporation like Pacific Rubiales, is allowed to reach such strength and magnitude that it account for 41% of the growth in the oil production of Colombia, and furthermore, uses its power to unduly influence the Colombian government and to undermine the neighboring state, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
Pacific Rubiales, a Canadian oil company, is the largest independent oil company operating in South America.  It is directly implicated and denounced by numerous Colombian NGO sand unions, for usurpation of natural resources, environmental degradation, forced displacement of indigenous and rural communities, blatant violations of human rights, economic damages and impoverishing and harassing the labour force and its union. It is implicated in paramilitary violence including murders, disappearances and death threats. We have heard here today examples of these nefarious dealings. [ii] The fact that it works along with the Colombian state oil company ECOPETROL is used to their advantage as PR, as they also give a good “nationalistic” spin to their enterprise. In other words, as corporations erode democracy, they become facilitators of state terrorism.
And, now this corporation is entering into the area of international conflict.  The President of the Venezuelan state owned oil company PDVSA, Rafael Ramírez, warned last Sunday that this transnational Canadian oil company Pacific Rubiales “finances and conspires openly “ against the Bolivarian government of Venezuela. ‘This is a very dangerous company”, he said, “the attack against PDVSA is really an attack against our oil policies because PDVSA is an instrument of our sovereignty.” [iii]
Pacific Rubiales is exploring for oil all along the Venezuelan frontier having built already 55 exploratory wells at a cost of $355 m. It is believed they are preparing to dig horizontally to tap into Venezuelan oil fields across the border.

Pacific Rubiales , which operates in the largest oil area of Colombia has in its Board of Directors ,Venezuelans, former PDVSA executives who were responsible for the oil lockout of 2002 and 2003 which brought  down the economy of the country  and caused US$ 25,000 million dollars damage. [iv]It was an economic coup d’etat, to try to bring down the legitimate government of President Chávez by paralyzing the economy with sabotage, destruction of computer operations, dangerous fires and blocking exports. These men should be behind bars for their crimes against the people of Venezuela.
Mr. Ramírez , who is also Minister of Energy and Petroleum, denounced by name, these board directors  responsible for the sabotage. If they ever came to power again they would hand over PDVSA to Pacific Rubiales.
The directors include:[v]
Ronald Pantin, an industrial engineer who worked in PDVSA for 23 years , one of the orchestrators of the oil sabotage
Jose Franciso Arata another important ex-PDVSA executive, geologist and engineer with 20 years experience in oil exploration
Miguel Rodríguez who was an important figure in Venezuelan banking and behind the oil sabotage.
Augusto López Valencia, representative of the powerful Grupo Santo Domingo enterprises.
Serafino Iacomo, an expert in capital investment who was the one to chose Colombia as the place to go with his former colleagues
Miguel de la Campa, economist who studied at Georgetown USA and was behind the inclusion of the company on the stock markets in Toronto, Sao Paulo and Bogotá.
Among the directors is an ex-CIA agent,  Neil Woodyer, in charge of CIA expansion and, to Canada’s shame,   Dennis Mills, former cabinet minister during Pierre Trudeau’s government.
Minister Ramírez, however, expressed his faith in the oil workers whom he said “were conscious and prepared to defend PDVSA. Our oil industry is in patriotic hands. And those plans of the opposition fills us with determination and mobilizes us.” 
It is right that he be optimistic about the oil workers because, after all, it was they who saved PDVSA from destruction during the oil lockout. They defiantly showed that the workers were capable of operating the very complex and highly technological enterprise without top or even the middle management that had walked out. Thousands of ordinary workers, hundreds of former workers and executives, and a handful of electronic engineer students from the universities came out to save the industry, indeed to save the Venezuelan economy.
It was a magnificent moment of Venezuelan history because in the midst of grave danger, in the face of almost despair the workers themselves saved their country, their oil company, their economy.
Oil workers became heroes overnight. And this pride in their collective accomplishment gives them strength in the face of the conspiracy of the traitors who conspire against Venezuela through Pacific Rubiales.
Last Friday, the Venezuelan Foreign Minster Elias Jaua, informed that soon when President Maduro meets President Santos, he will present to him evidence of the conspiracy that is being plotted, not by his government, but in Bogotá, against Venezuela, which includes economic sabotage, paramilitary operations and the 18 fighter planes that the rightwing Bogotá conspirators have bought in the USA to be taken to a Colombian  air base in the coming months. [vi]
Of course, the Colombian government itself has strong, armed forces that have 50 years experience of conflict and they are twice as large as Venezuela’s and further they have the backing of the USA forces.  So if it came to open war between the two countries, undoubtedly Colombia would have a huge advantage.
But, because of the now important consolidation of Latin America that President Chávez ushered in, with integration instruments such as CELAC, UNASUR, MERCOSUR, ALBA, BANCO DEL SUR, PETROCARIBE and PETROSUR, Colombia feels such pressure to be part of the new regional infrastructure. As well, due to President Chavez’ unprecedented peace overture to Colombia and its people, and due to the risk to the billion dollar trade between the two countries, the chances of open formal conflict between the nations has receded. This is also helped by the fact that Uribe is no longer the president of Columbia as his excessive and obsessive antagonism to Venezuela was a true danger to both nations.
Therefore, the elements of the hard right that wish to see the end of the Bolivarian Revolution and its government in Venezuela take recourse in underhand, covert, actions such as use of paramilitary force, the buying of private fighter planes and economic destabilization with also the power of Pacific Rubiales.
Such a conspiracy is specifically forbidden by the 1981 UN Declaration on the Inadmissibility and Intervention in the Internal Affairs of States,  which stresses the “imperative need for any threat of aggression, any recruitment, any use of armed bands, in particular mercenaries, against sovereign States to be completely ended, so as to enable the peoples of all States to determine their own political, economic and social systems without external interference or control.”
We must all act with consciousness, awareness of the forces that are working towards the subjugation of humankind and the destruction of the planet’s ecosystems.
We here in Canada have the opportunity to try to influence our government to demand social, environmental and political responsibility from Canadian companies that work oversees. When they harass workers and unions, use paramilitary to kill, disappear and threaten people, when they displace indigenous and rural communities, when they become part of assassinations and conspiracies, they do it in our name – because they are known as being a Canadian company.
We have the opportunity also to try to dissuade the Canadian board member, Dennis Mills. He is a member of the Liberal party, a former minister under the Pierre Trudeau, representing the riding of Danforth; he organized the Rolling Stones concert in 2003 to counteract the SARS epidemic impacts, and as a Roman Catholic, he organized the World Youth Day that had Pope John Paul II come to Toronto in 2002. He is also CEO of Racing Futures, an organization of horse racing. I urge you all to send him a message, not a threatening message, but one of genuine information. Let us give him the benefit of the doubt that he does not know the sinister company he is associated with. At least, in the end, he will not be able to say “I did not know of the murders, assassinations, displacements, rights violations and death threats”.
We must work for the unity in Latin America that was urged so passionately by our beloved heroes, the great Liberator Simón Bolívar and our Eternal Comandante, Hugo Chávez Frías. And we must work hard so that corporations do not unduly influence our government, undermine our democracy,  and  do not contribute to the oppression and misery of Latin American people.



[i] Thomas Hobbes, “Leviathan” 1651
[ii] Telelsur, 17 August 2013
[iii] “Gobierno venezolano denuncia conspiración de empresa Pacific Rubiales”, TELESUR, 30 June 2013
[iv] La Trinchera, interview with  Will rangel, Presdient of the oil union, Central Bolivariana Socialista de Trabajadores Petroleros, http://www.latrinchera.org/foros/showthread.php?38519-MULTADOS-EXTRABAJADORES-DE-PDVSA-POR-DAÑOS-CAUSADOS-A-LA-NACION
[v] Alfredo Oliva, aporrea 24/03/2013
[vi] AVN / domingo 16 de junio 2013

Tuesday 20 August 2013

Otra Vez Canada Sin Parlamento


OTRA VEZ CANADA SIN PARLAMENTO


María Páez Victor


Comentario Político
Noticiero Panorma
Radio Voces Latinas
Toronto
20 agosto 2013


Por cuarta vez, el Primer Ministro de Canadá, Stephen Harper, va  a clausurar prematuramente, la sesión del Parlamento el cual había de abrir sus puertas luego de las vacaciones de verano, el 16 de septiembre.  En inglés esto se denomina,  PROROGUE, o sea, va a prorrogar el Parlamento. Ello significa que los parlamentarios se irán a sus casas, todo trabajo cesa, incluso el trabajo de los comités parlamentarios que son tan importantes para preparar las leyes.

 El Parido Conservador va a tener su convencion del 31 de octubre al 2 de noviembre ; es posible que Harper no convoque el Parlamento hasta entonces, aunque estan diciendo que quizás lo haga el 21 de Octubre.

Tradicionalmente, un gobierno parlamentario prorroga la sesión cuando el gobierno desea un cambio en sus prioridades, en su agenda, y por tanto necesita finalizar esos planes y luego anunciarlos a través del representante de la Reina Elizabeth, en este caso, el Gobernador General, Su Excelencia el Honorable David Johnston, quien anuncia dichas prioridades en lo que se llama, el Discurso desde el Trono.

Sin embargo, hemos visto como este primer ministro ha distorcionado estas tradiciones y ha prorrogado el Parlamento por razones netamente partidistas  para salvar su gobierno de críticas. Lo hizo en diciembre 2008 para salvarse de una coalición de la oposición que hubiera echado a bajo su gobierno. Lo hizo en diciembre del 2009 para evitar el escándalo del trato de prisioneros en Afghanistán, y ahora lo hace para evitar el escándalo de la falta de ética y francamente, hurto, en el Senado por parte de dos prominentes senadores conservadores Mike Duffy y Pamela Wallin.

El gobierno dice que no, que esta prorrogación se debe a que como tienen nuevos ministros, tienen mucho trabajo que hacer para formular nuevas políticas. Es cierto que hay 8 nuevos ministros que nunca han ejercido cargo, más 20 ministros con nuevos puestos. Pero que un partido gobernante diga abiertamente que no está listo para gobernar es realmente inaceptable.

Habrán aquellos que notarán que hay 4 elecciones parciales  (by-elections) para escoger parlamentarios en Ontario, Quebec y Manitoba, y estas tienen que llevarse a cabo después del 21 de octubre. Y los de mente sospechosa, dirán que es coincidencia que quedará como  letra muerta la legislación que el parlamento estaba considerando para  regular las finanzas electorales, especificamente, el asunto de préstamos para elecciones.

Queda también como letra muerta el trabajo sobre la reforma del Senado impulsado por el escándalo de los Senadores Duffy y Wallin.  Aunque la Corte Suprema se va a pronunciar sobre el mismo este otoño.

El líder de la Oposición Tom Mulcair, del NDP, ha criticado a Harper por cerrar el Parlamento, y ha dicho que este gobierno “está desgastado por los escándalos éticos y por su falta de gestión.” Los Liberals dicen que Harper no tiene planes de gobierno, que no está preparado.

Parece que los Canadienses ya no le dan mayor importancia a estas maniobras de Harper, pues los periódicos le han dado poca cobertura. En cualquier otro país hubiera provocado bastante sosobra política. Pero no es cierto que los canadienses sean indiferentes. Están desgastado por un gobierno y unos partidos políticos que no toman en cuenta la opinión pública como deberían, dentro de un esquema político que favorece las élites políticas pero deja poco para la participación ciudadana.


En un reciente estudio se comprobó que los canadiense si participan mucho en asociaciones y organizaciones, ya que 58% son miembros de éstas; un  55% hacen  trabajo voluntario a las mismas y un 84% dona dinero a caridades o organizaciones no-gubernamentales. Estas son cifras que demuestrasn el sentido de responsabilidad social y de participación cívica de los ciudadanos de este país, sin embargo, el estudio también indica  que solamente un 10% son miembros de un partido político y solamente un 10% dona dinero a un partido político.

Estas cifran indican que los partidos, incluyendo el del gobierno, no están afrontando los asuntos que realmente son de imporantcia para la vida de los canadienses. El gobierno sale con planes ecónomicos inútiles que no son más que propaganda, los partidos de oposición son ambiguous y timoratos, tenemos un aparato del estado que cada vez es más intrusivo de la privacidad del ciudadano, seguimos dependiendo de la extracción y uso  del petróleo, se han desmembrado las leyes de protección al ambiente y año a año el clima va cambiando marcadamente,  cada vez hay recortes a los servicios de salud y educación bajo la supuesta excusa de la necesidad de austeridad, la educación post-secundaria se hace más cara, el gobierno aumenta el gasto militar sin consulta alguna, y vemos como la desigualdad, el desempleo y la inseguridad económica crece en vez de disminuir.

Necesitamos políticos con coraje y visión,  necesitamos ciudadanos con voz y con acción. Una democracia necesita que sus ciudadanos sean activos, vigilantes, no apatéticos. Nosotros, los latino-canadienses, hemos vivido en carne propia muchas situaciones políticas que nos da cierta perspectiva que quizás los canadienses no han tenido. Sabemos que la democracia es frágil, Sabemos cuán fácil es caer en peligro del facismo.

Necesitamos estar allí en los partidos, compartiendo nuestras experiencias, y ayudando a construir una Canadá más democrática e igualitaria.


Bibliografía

·      Jessica Bruno & Laura Ryckert, The Hill Times, 08/19/2013
·      Globe and Mail, 19 August 2013
·      Adam Kingsmith, rabble, 14 August 2013
·      Foundation for Democratic Advancement, Report on Canada 2013

Tuesday 13 August 2013

ALBA: Latin America's groundbreaking alliance of solidarity and mutual aid


ALBA: Latin America's groundbreaking alliance of solidarity and mutual aid

August 8, 2013
image/jpeg iconalba.jpg [7]
"[We agree] to convert our countries, not into zones of free trade, but in zones free of hunger, illiteracy, misery and margialization" - Declaration of the XII Summit of ALBA, Guayaquil, July 30, 2013.
In the United States for half a decade the percentage of people in poverty has increased every year, from 12.3 per cent in 2006 to 15.1 per cent in 2010. [1] In the European Union, poverty remains high with 115 million people (23 per cent) at risk in 2010 -- that is a 20 per cent rise from that of the previous year. [2]
In contrast, the extraordinary achievements of the ALBA countries (Cuba, Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua, San Vincent and The Granadines, Antigua and Barbuda, and Venezuela) in less than a decade include:
- Eliminated poverty for 11 millon people;
- Increased literacy rate from 84 to 96 per cent;
- Reduced infant mortality rates by 32 per cent;
- Enrolled hundreds of student at the Latin American School of Medicine, Cuba, to develop sorely needed medical workers. [3]
In this context, ALBA's achievements are exceptional.
Perhaps North America and European countries would do well to set aside their prejudices, and realize that they can learn something significant from the South, specifically from the Bolivarian Alliance of the Peoples of Our America, known by its Spanish acronym, ALBA. It is an original, historic, radical, project to preserve sovereignty and attain the liberation of the peoples of Latin America from poverty and misery. Its name, in Spanish, means dawn, and it represents a new dawn for solidarity and cooperation for the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean and has significant implications for international exchanges in general.
It was proposed by President Hugo Chávez on December 12, 2001, at the Third Summit of Heads of State of South America and the Caribbean, in Margarita Island. At that time, President Chávez stated:
There will be no independence in Venezuela if there is no integration of the nations of these people of South America and the Caribbean … Only united will we be free, only united can we raise the levels of development that our peoples need in order to live in dignity.
He was giving expression to great dream of Simón Bolívar, the Liberator of Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador, who fortold that unless the new republics banded together, they would be prey to foreign powers, specifically, to the then growing power of the United States.
President Chávez proposed a real alternative to the supposed "free trade" agreement zone that U.S. President George Bush wanted to establish in the entire region that would eliminate trade barriers and tighten intellectual property protection. These two key components of the proposal would consolidate U.S. and corporate control since they would wield remarkably unequal economic power with respect to the regional nations. This scheme was thoroughly rejected by the Latin American countries in Argentina, Mar de Plata, in November 2005. They clearly understood that there was nothing free about "free trade" and it would only open of every conceivable door to multinational corporations to continue pillaging of the region.
On December 14, 2004, Cuba and Venezuela signed the first document creating ALBA, and declared its main objective to be: "To construct the Great Homeland in Latin America following the dreams of the heroes of our struggles for emancipation." Cuba and Venezuela led the way with the first step consisting of their revolutionary and highly successful trade: oil for doctors.
It is important to highlight what ALBA is not.
In the 1950s the U.S. Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles, without any trace of irony, made a cold statement of fact, saying: "The United States has no friends, only interests." Historical events have proven that he was perfectly honest. The values behind ALBA are exactly contrary to this this way of conceiving the relationship with other countries. ALBA is the opposite of the Monroe Doctrine, which states that the region is of the sole interest of the U.S. government, and it is the opposite of the U.S. Free Trade Agreements that are about making the region "free" for the U.S. corporations.
ALBA is a cohesive alternative vision of international trade and mutual aid based on complementarity and solidarity, not domination or exploitation. It is creating an infrastructure for making real the ideal of Latin American integration dreamed of by Simón Bolívar. As the Executive Secretary of ALBA stated: "ALBA's fight is for a second true independence for Latin America and the Caribbean -- to free ourselves from poverty and illiteracy and achieve development for our people." [4]
ALBA is Latin America helping Latin America. For over a century the countries of the region were locked in a submissive relationship with the hegemonic power of the United States as it used its considerable social, political and economic means to divide the countries from each other, to sow the seeds of distrust among them, as if nothing of value could be obtained unless it came from the North. Historically it has been in the interest of the United States' political hegemony and the interest of corporate capitalism, which amount to the same, that the Latin American and Caribbean nations have weak states, both administratively as well as politically, thus fostering dependency.
ALBA is a state-centred instrument to counterbalance this. Nevertheless, it also gives a participating and significant role to the social movements in the countries, hence the word "people" in its title, which is broader than the words nation or state.
The dream of Latin American unity and independence is ALBA's rich historical background. First of all, the original native people's struggles against the Spanish invaders, against genocide, enslavement, oppression, colonization, exemplified by the heroic deeds of indigenous leaders such as Guaicaipuro, Cuactemoc, Tupac Amaru, Leonardo Chininos, Lautaro, Tupac Katari, Lampira, Urraca -- to name a few -- and the millions of their people who died for liberty.
Then the heroes of Latin American independence, Francisco de Miranda, Simón Bolívar, Jose Martí, José de San Martin, Antonio José de Sucre, Miguel Hidalgo, Bernardo O'Higgins, José María Morelos, José Gervasio Artigas, Simón Rodríguez, Francisco Morazán, and many others that understood the geopolitical need of union if the region were to be free.
In modern times, many progressive and revolutionary leaders have advocated and worked for a more independent and integrated relationship between the nations of the region -- notably, Che Guevara. These fighters and thinkers are the background of a revolutionary Indo-Latin American doctrine of integration that runs like a thread throughout the decades.
However, ALBA is itself an original project, a model that breaks the mold of previous relationships between nations. There have been many historic alliances between countries before, but these have been either for war (like NATO) or for pure commerce like the European Union which, we have clearly seen in recent times, has just made Europe safe for corporations and banks, and has beggared its peoples, especially in those European countries that presented weaker capitalist economies. Indeed, one of the implicit thrusts of the European Union economic policies has been to weaken the welfare state infrastructure and increase privatization.
ALBA is different. It is a cohesive alternative vision of international trade and mutual aid based on complementarity and solidarity not domination or exploitation and its purpose is to help each country develop and overcome the conditions of poverty. It is an egalitarian relationship between the countries, an integration that has a deep respect for each country's sovereignty. It has a strong trade component, but focused on the real economic needs of the population.
ALBA has no equal in the world. The countries of the ALBA seek social, political, and economic integration in so far as these help them vanquish poverty and increase the social welfare of their peoples through projects of mutual aid and complementary trade. ALBA does not act in isolation, it has strong links to the other instruments of regional integration: the Bank of the South, UNASUR and CELAC. [5]
This integration is not just words and beautiful sentiments. The ALBA countries are using the rich natural and human resources of their region to promote the potential of its people, to lift them out of poverty and create happier and healthier lives for them helping each other in the most pressing of their needs. Thus they have established 12 types of public Grand Enterprises that are multi-national between the ALBA nations, in order to strengthen their economies, including the following areas: Food production, including preservation of seeds; microcredits; Energy, petroleum and gas -- working with PetroCaribe; literacy and post-literacy education; telecommunications; production of medicines that Big Pharma neglects or overprices; infrastructure such as cement, sanitation and clean water; alliance of universities and research; ministerial Council for Women; cultural foundation for preserving and promoting cultures; a sports alliance; and, health and education policies.
These projects count on two key ALBA institutions: its own currency, the Sucre, and its own Bank of ALBA. The ALBA countries can now circumvent the use of the U.S. dollar because they have their own virtual currency, the Sucre, named after Bolivar's famous Field Marshal. Much economic thought and planning has taken place to allow the use of the Sucre in such a way that it is equitable and represents true value of the exchanges. This is a very real defense against the financial crisis that now besets Europe and the U.S., and it de-couples the national currencies from the dollar, saving them millions by not having to use a foreign currency for international exchanges. There are countries that have expressed the wish to use the Sucre even if they are not members of the alliance.
The ALBA countries no longer need to go begging to the World Bank or International Monetary Fund for needed funding, credit or capital, for their development, because now they have their own Bank of ALBA, created in 2009, that contrary to those dubious international organisms, does not come with strings attached, conditions to the loans, to manipulate the countries' domestic affairs or conditions of usury. This year -- 2013 -- so far, there have been 1,500 transations with the Sucre, equivalent to $670 million (US), for prefabricated houses, medical equipment, medicines, and vehicles. [6]
The loans and exchanges in ALBA recognzie each country's strenghts, their unique path of development: "These exchanges allow each nation to pursue its own development objectives in a far more sustainable and equitable way than if it were forced to rely solely on its own resources or respond to global market imperatives." [7]
This is also a defense against the world's financial crisis.
Multinational corporations exploiting the natural resources of Latin America have had deadly environmental impacts that include destroyed biodiversity and ecosystems as they have trampled on the human rights of indigenous peoples. The ALBA countries wish to preserve their natural environments and very significantly have made a forceful declaration denouncing climate change and the attitude of the richer nations to it. They have had a strong voice in recent environmental and climate change summits. Theyhave said [8]: "Nature is our home and is the system of which we form part, and therefore it has infinite value, but it does not have a price and is not for sale."
The ALBA countries will undoubtedly learn a lot from Cuba about protecting the environment because Cuba has the distinction of being the only country in the world with the smallest ecological footprint and at the same time the highest indicator of human wellbeing. It is a genuine example to the world that a country need not destroy its natural habitat in order to live well.
In the last week of July 2013, the XII Summit of ALBA took place in Guayaquil, Ecuador, with the particpation of the presidents of the nations. These meetings are not simply a meeting of presidents and their staff, it is also a meeting of the social movements, who send formal delegates. All the presidents meet with hundreds of them to interchange ideas and projects. It is a vastly different encounter than than the exclusive and security obsessed summits of the G8 and UN. True to its philosophy, ALBA is profoundly participatry and democratic.
At this recent meeting, a ninth country was incorporated into ALBA, St. Lucia. ALBA has spurred the interest of other countries in the region such as Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Grenada, Surinam and Haiti, but also countries outside the region such as Russia, China, Syria. The summit concluded, among other issues, to place a demand before the UN against the USA for its massive global scale spying, to increase the cooperation with Haiti in health and education, to take a stand against international arbitrors that favour corporations, and to deepen the relationships with social movements. [8]
It is a new dawn. Latin America is waking up to its own strengths and its own capabilities. It is walking down its own chosen path.
A long time ago the great Cuban hero, José Marti, said: "Where is Latin America going, who unites it and who guides it? Alone, as one people it will rise up. Alone it will fight. Alone it will triumph."

Maria Paez Victor, a Venezuelan sociologist currently based in Toronto, has written and spoken extensively in support of Venezuela's Bolivarian process. She is a member of the Louis Riel Bolivarian Circle, Toronto. This article is based on a talk given at a meeting on ALBA: "Solidarity in Action: ALBA a Model of People's Collaboration," at OISE, Toronto, organized by the Latin American Solidarity Network, Louis Riel Bolivarian Circle, and Toronto Bolivia Solidarity, OISE, Toronto, July, 31, 2013. 

Notes
[1] Census Bureau report 2011, quoted in Karen Weise, "Record US Poverty Rates Hold as Inequality Grows,"  Bloomberg Buisnessweek, 12 September 2012.
[2] European Public Health Alliance, EPHA, www.epha.org [9].
[3] Amenothep Zambrano, Executive Secretary of ALBA, quoted by Matt Murray in "Stunning Achievements of Latin American Alliance ALBA celebrated,"  Liberation.com, 20 February 2011.
[4] Amenothep Zambrano, op.cit. 2011.
[5] UNASUR is the asociation of Ministries of Defence aimed at preserving the defense of the region and CELAC aims to displace the OAS as the genuine political representatives and deciders of the region.
[6] "ALBA countries conducted $670 m. in trade using common curency in 2013,"  Embassy of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Washington DC..
[7] Martin Hart-Landsberg, "Learning from ALBA and the Bank of the South: Challenges and Possibilities,"  Monthly Review, 2 August 2013.
[8] Sally Burch, "El ALBA hacia una zona libre de miseria," Rebelión, 2 August 2013.


Importancia del ALBA


VIERNES, 9 DE AGOSTO DE 2013


Importancia del ALBA

María Páez Victor (especial para ARGENPRESS.info)

Trabajo basado en una charla dada en un evento sobre el ALBA: “Solidarity in Action: ALBA a Model of People’s Collaboration”, en la Universided de Toronto, OISE, organizado por Latin American Solidarity Network, Círculo Bolivariano Louis Riel, y Toronto Bolivia Solidarity, 31 julio 2013.

“(convenimos)en convertir nuestras naciones, no solamente en zonas de libre comercio, sino en zonas libres de hambre, analfabetismo, miseria y marginalizacion”(Declarción de la XII Cumbre del ALBA, Guayaquil, 30 julio 2013)

En los Estados Unidos durante media década, el porcentaje de personas pobres ha incrementado cada año desde el 12.3% en el 2006 al 15.1% en el 2010. (1) En la Unión Europea, la pobreza permanece alta con 115 millones de personas (23%) en 2010, ésto es un 20% más que el año anterior. (2)

En contraste, los logros excepcionales de los países de la Alianza Bolivariana para los Pueblos de Nuestra America - Tratado de Comercio de los Pueblos, (ALBA-TCP) conocido generalmente como ALBA (Cuba, Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua, San Vincent & Las Granadinas, Antigua & Barbuda, y Venezuela) en menos de una década incluyen los siguientes:

• Han sacado de la pobreza a 11 millones de personas

• Han incrementado el porcentaje de personas que saben leer y escribir del 84% al 96%

• Han reducido la mortalidad infantil en un 32%

• Han inscrito cientos de estudiantes en la Escuela Latioamericana de Medicina en Cuba, para desarrollar el personal medico que tanto se necestita. (3)

En este contexto, los logros del ALBA son extraordinarios.

Quizás los países de Norte America y Europa harían bien en poner de lado sus prejuicios y darse cuenta de que pueden aprender algo del Sur, especificamente del ALBA. El ALBA es un proyecto original, histórico, radical para preservar la soberanía y liberar a los pueblos de Latinoamérica y el Caribe de la pobreza y miseria. Como su nombre implica, es un nuevo amanecer, amanecer de solidaridad y cooperación para los países de la región y tiene implicaciones significativas para el intercambio internacional en general. El Presidente Hugo Chávez propuso el ALBA el 12 de diciembre 2001, en la Tercera Cumbre de los Jefes de Estado de Suramérica y el Caribe que tuvo lugar en la Isla de Margarita. En ese entonces, el Presidente Chávez dijo:

“No habrá independencia en Venezuela si no hay integración de las naciones de estos pueblos de Suramérica y el Caribe…Solamente unidos seremos libres, solamente unidos podremos levantar los nivles de desarrollo que nuestros pueblos necesitan para vivir con dignidad”.

Estaba expresando el gran sueño del Libertador de Venezuela, Colombia, Perú, Bolivia y Ecuador, Simón Bolívar, quien prognosticó que si las nuevas repúblicas no se unían, serían acechadas por las naciones poderosas, especificamente, por el creciente poder de los Estados Unidos de Norte America.

El Presidente Chávez propuso una verdadera alternativa al supuesto tratado de “libre” comercio que el presidente de los Estados Unidos, George Bush deseaba para la región entera, la cual eliminaría barreras arancelarias y fortalecería las protecciones a la propiedad intelectual. Estos dos componenetes claves tendrían la función de consolidar el control de los Estados Unidos y de las corporaciones, pues gozan de un poder económico desmsurado con respecto al de las naciones de la región. Este proyecto fue rotundamente rechazado por los países latinoamericanos en Mar de Plata, Argentina en noviembre del 2005. Ellos claramente comprendieron que no había nada “libre” en ese tratado que solamente le abriría todas las puertas posibles a las corporaciones multinacionales para que continuaran su rapiña de la región.

El 14 de diciembre de 2004, Cuba y Venezuela firmaron el primer documento creando el ALBA, y declararon que su primer objetivo era el de:“ Construír la Patria Grande en Latinoamérica sigeeindo el sueño de los héroes de nuestras luchas emancipadoras.” Cuba y Venezuela abrieron el camino con los primeros pasos de su intercambio revolucionario y altamente exitoso: petróleo por doctores.

Es importante resaltar lo que NO es el ALBA.

En la década de 1950, el Secretario de Estado de los Estados Unidos, el diplomático de carrera John Foster Dulles hizo la siguiente declaración friamente, sin ningún razgo de ironía: ”Los Estados Unidos no tiene amigos, solamente intereses.” Eventos históricos han comprobado que habló con perfecta honestidad. Pues, los valores que sustena el ALBA son exactamente lo contrario a este modo de concebir la relación con otros países. El ALBA es tambión lo opuesto a la Docrina Monroe que pretnede que la región es del único interees del gobierno de Estados Unidos, y también el ALBA es lo opuesto a los Tratados de LIbre Comercio de los Estados Unidos cuyo fin es hacer de la region “libre” para las corporaciones estadosunidenses.

El ALBA es una visión coherente, alternativa, de comercio internacional y de ayuda mutua basada en la complementaridad y la solidaridad, no la dominación o explotación. Está creando una infraestructura para plasmar en realidad el ideal de la integración Latinoamericana que soñó Simón Bolívar. Como dijo el Secretario Ejecutivo del ALBA : “ La lucha del ALBA es por una segunda, verdadera independencia para Lationamérica y el Caribe - para liberarnos de la pobreza y el analfabetismo y lograr el desarrollo para nuestros pueblos.” (4)

El ALBA es Latinoamérica ayudando a Latinoamérica. Por más de un siglo los países de la región estaban encerrados en una relación sumisa con el poder hegemónico de los Estados Unidos, el cual utilizó su considerables medios sociales, políticos y ecoómicos para dividr las naciones unas de otras, para sembrar las semillas de la desconfianza entre ellas, para que pensaran que nada de valor podía obtenerse a menos que proveniera del Norte. Históricamente ha sido en el interés de la hegemonía estadosunidense y el interés del capitalismo corporativo - que vienen a ser la misma cosa- que Latinoamérica y el Caribe tuviesen estados débiles, tanto administrativamente como políticamente, y así alientar su dependencia.

El ALBA es un instrumento centrado en el estado para contrabalancear esta situación. Sin embargo, también le da un papel signficativo y participativo a los movimientos sociales regionales, de allí la palabar “pueblos” en su título, palabra más amplia que nación o país.

EL sueño de la unidad e independencia latinoamericana es el rico trasfondo del ALBA. Primeramente, con las luchas de los pueblos originarios contra los invasores españoles, contra el genocidio, la esclavidud, la opresión, la colonización, demostradas en las acciones heróicas de los líderes indígenas como Guaicaipuro, Cuactemoc, Tupac Amaru, Leonardo Chininos, Lautaro, Tupac Katari, Lampira, Urraca - y los millones de sus pueblos que murieron por su libertad.

Luego los héroes de la Independencia latinoamericana como lo son Francisco de Miranda, Simón Bolívar, José Martí, José de San Martin, Antonio José de Sucre, Miguel Hidalgo, Bernardo O’Higgins, José María Morelos, José Gervasio Artigas, Simón Rodríguez, Francisco Morazán, y muchos otros que comprendieron la necesidad geopolítica de unión regional si es que han de ser libres. En tiempos modernos, muchos líders progresistas y revolucionarios han promulgado y han luchado buscando una relación mas independiente y relación mas integrada entre las naciones, notablemente el Ché Guevara. Estos luchadores y pensadores son la base de la doctrina revolucionaria Indo-Latinoamericana de integración que corre como un hilo a través de las décadas.

No obstante, el ALBA en sí es un proyecto original, un modelo que rompe el molde de previas relaciones entre la naciones. Han habido muchas alianzas históricas entre naciones en el pasado, pero estas han sido para la guerra (como NATO) o para el comercio como la Unión Europea. Esta última hemos visto claramente en estos tiempos recientes, que solamente ha asegurado a Europa para el benefinco de las corporaciones y lo bancos y ha hundido en la miseria a sus pueblos, especialmente aquellos en los países europeos que tienen una economía capitalista más debil. En verdad, una de las tendencias implicitas de la Unión Europea ha sido debilitar las infraestrucutras de los estados de bienestar e incrementar la privatización.

El ALBA es diferente. Su vision alternativa es coherente y le da al intercambio internacional un factor nuevo, la ayuda mutua basada en la complementaridad y solidaridad humana no la dominación o explotación, y su objetivo es ayudar a cada país a desarrollarse y combatir las condiciones de pobreza. Es una relacion igualitaria entre los países, una integración que lleva un profundo respeto por la soberanía de cada país. Lleva un componente fuerte de intercambio comercial, pero enfocado en las necesidades económicas reales de la población.

El ALBA no tiene igual en el mundo. Los países del ALBA buscan la integración social, política y económica en tanto que ésta los ayude a eliminar la pobreza e incrementar el bienestar social de sus pueblos a través de proyectos de ayuda mutua y de intercambio complementario. El ALBA no acteú en aislameinto, tiene fuertes nexos con los otros instrumentos regionales de integración: el Banco del Sur, UNASUR, PETROSUR, PETROCARIBE y CELAC. (5)

Esta integración no consiste simplemente en frases bonitas y bellos sentimientos. El ALBA están utiizando sus ricos recursos humanos y naturales para promover el potencial de sus pueblos, para levantarlos de la pobreza y crear vidas más felices y sanas para ayudándolos con sus necesidades más basicas Con este fin han establecido 12 tipos de Gran-Empresas públicas, que son multinacionales dentro del ALBA, que van a fortalecer sus economías; incluyen las siguientes áreas:

o Producción de alimentos, incluso la preservación de semillas
o Microcréditos
o Energía, petróleo y gas, trabajando conjuntamente con PETROCARIBE
o Lucha contra el analfabetismo y la educación subsiguiente
o Telecommunicación
o Manufactura de medicinas que las compañías grandes no producen o cobran demasiado
o Infrastructura tal como cemento, sanidad y agua potable
o Alianza de universidades y de investigación académica
o Consejo Ministerial para la Mujer
o Fundación Cultural para preservar las culturas
o Alianza Deportiva
o Políticas de salud y educación

Todos estos proyectos cuentan con dos instituciones del ALBA que son cláves: su propia moneda virtual, el Sucre, y el Banco del ALBA. Estos países ahora pueden evitar el uso de dólar estadosunidense porque tienen su propia moneda virtual, el Sucre, llamada asi en honoro al famoso Mariscal de Bolívar, Antonio José de Sucre. Se llevó a cabo mucha planificación y mucho análisis económico para llegar a una fórmula que permita utilizar el Sucre de mode tal que sea equitativo y que represente el verdadero valor de los intercambios. Ello es una verdadera defensa contra la crisis financiera que azota a Europa y los Estados Unidos, y separa las monedas nacionales del dolar, asi salvándoles millones al no tener que usar una moneda extranjera para sus intercambios. El éxito del Sucre ha ocasionado que países fuera de la región hayan expresado deseo de utizar el Sucre, aún no siendo miembros del ALBA.

Los países del ALBA no tienen que ir medigándole al Banco Mundial o al Fondo Monetario Internacional para obtener los fondos, crédito o capital, que neceitan para su desarrollo, porque ahora tienen su propio Banco del ALBA, creado en el 2009, que al contrario de esos dudosos organismos internacionales, el banco del ALBA no vincula préstamos con condiciones que manipulan los asuntos domésticos de los países ni tampoco llevan condiciones de usura. Solamente en lo que va de este año -2013- han habido 1,500 transacciones con el Sucre, equivalente a US$ 670 milliones, para obtener casas pre-fabricadas, equipos médicos y vehículos. (6)

Los préstamos e intercambios del ALBA reconocen las fortalezas de cada país y sus caminos autóctonos de desarrollo. “Estos intercambios permiten a cada nacion buscar sus propios objetivos de desarrollo de un modo mucho mas sustentable y equitativo que si fuesen forzado a depender exclusivamente de sus porpios recursos o responder a los imperativos del mercado global.” (7)

Esto tambien es una defensa ante la crisis financiera mundial.

Las grandes corporaciones multinacionales que explotan los recursos de Latinoamérica y el Caribe han tenido un impacto ambiental fatal que incluye la destrucción de biodiversidad y ecosistemas a medida que también pisotean los derechos humanos de las poblaciones indígenas. El ALBA desea preservar sus recursos naturales y ha dado declaraciones muy significativas denunciado el cambio climático y la actitud de los países más ricos hacia el mismo. Ha sido una voz fuerte en las cumbres ambientales recientes. Ha declarado lo siguiente:

“La Naturaleza en nuestro hogar y es el sistema del cual formamos parte, y por tanto tiene un valor infinito, pero no tiene precio y no está a la venta..”(15 November 2010)

Los países del ALBA sin duda aprenderán mucho de Cuba de como proteger el medio ambiente pues Cuba tiene la distinción de ser el único país en el mundo con las más pequeña huella ecológica y al mismo tiempo con un alto índice de bienestar humano. Es un genuino ejemplo al mundo que un país no necesita destruir su habitat natural para vivir bien.

En la última semana de julio 2013, se llevó a cabo la XII Cumbre del ALBA en Guayaquil, Ecuador, con la participación de los Presidentes de las naciones. Estos encuentros no son simplemtne encuentros entre presidentes y sus ministros, sino también encuentro con los movimientos sociales quienes envían sus delegados. Todos los presidentes se reúnen con cientos de estos delegados para intercambiar ideas y proyectos. Es una reunión infinitamente diferente a las de el G8 ó de las Naciones Unidas. Fiel a su filosofía, el ALBA es profundamente participativa y democrática.

En esta reciente Cumbre, se incorporó un noveno paíse al ALBA, la isla caribeña de Sta. Lucía. ALBA ha despertado en otros países de la región mucho interés tal como Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Grenada, Surinam and Haití, pero también países lejanos como Russia, China, y Syria. La Cumbre concluyó, entre otros asuntos, denunciar a los Estados Unidos ante las Naciones Unidas por haber instalado un sistema global masivo de espionaje, tambien decidieron incrementar la cooperación educativa y de salud con Haití, y tomar una posición contra los mecanismos de arbitraje internacional que favorecen a las corporaciones, y también de profundizar la relación con los movimientos sociales. (8)

Es una nueva alba. América Latina y el Caribe se ha despertado a sus propias fortalezas y habilidades. Está caminando por el camino que ella misma ha determinado. Hace muchos años el gran héroe cubano, José Marti, dijo:

“A dónde va Latinoamérica, quién la une y quién la guía? Sola, como un solo pueblo se levantará. Sola luchará. Sola triunfará.”

Maria Páez Victor, Ph.D, es una socióloga venezolana radicada en Canadá, miembro fundadora del Círculo Bolivariano Louis Riel de Toronto.

Notas:
1) Census Bureau report 2011, citado en Karen Weise, “Record US Poverty Rates Hold as Inequality Grows”, Bloomberg Buisnessweek, 12 septiembre, 2012
2) European Public Health Alliance, EPHA, www.epha.org
3) Amenothep Zambrano, op.cit. 2011.
4) Amenothep Zambrano, Secretario Ejecutivo del ALBA, citado por Matt Murray en “Stunning Achievements of Latin American Alliance ALBA celebrated”, Liberation.com, 20 febrero 2011.
5) UNASUR es la asociación de Ministerios de Defensa regional que apunta a preservar la defensa de la regieon y CELAC es la asociación que espera desplazar la OEA como genuino representante de la región.
6) “ALBA countries conducted $670 m. in trade using common curency in 2013”, Embajada de la Republica Bolivariana Venezuela, Washington DC “
7) Martin Hart-Landsberg, “Learning from ALBA and the Bank of the South: Challenges and Possibilities”, Monthly Review, 2 agosto, 2013
8) Sally Burch, “El ALBA hacia una zona libre de miseria”, Rebelión, 2 agosto, 2013.
10